З новою силою та в оновленому складі ASGARD знову виходить на полювання! Наші нові молоді групи вже в небі, тож продовжуємо палити rusню! Наближаємо перемогу, впевненими кроками, заради вільної України!
Будемо вам вдячні за донати, адже зараз через збільшення груп, зросла і кількість розхідників, тож підтримуйте! Разом переможемо! 🇺🇦
З новою силою та в оновленому складі ASGARD знову виходить на полювання! Наші нові молоді групи вже в небі, тож продовжуємо палити rusню! Наближаємо перемогу, впевненими кроками, заради вільної України!
Будемо вам вдячні за донати, адже зараз через збільшення груп, зросла і кількість розхідників, тож підтримуйте! Разом переможемо! 🇺🇦
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. "There is a significant risk of insider threat or hacking of Telegram systems that could expose all of these chats to the Russian government," said Eva Galperin with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has called for Telegram to improve its privacy practices.
from us
