Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 7185 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Астафьев. Размышления. | Telegram Webview: astafievopinion/444 -
Воскресили монстра, которого теперь будет не остановить.
Лидер Хаят Тахрир аш-Шам уже заявил, что боевики вернут все сирийские территории, в том числе Голанские высоты, оккупированные Израилем с 1967 года. Так же и регион Идлиб, контролируемый Турцией.
Воскресили монстра, которого теперь будет не остановить.
Лидер Хаят Тахрир аш-Шам уже заявил, что боевики вернут все сирийские территории, в том числе Голанские высоты, оккупированные Израилем с 1967 года. Так же и регион Идлиб, контролируемый Турцией.
Допрыгались? Досамоутверждались? Эх…. 😔
BY Астафьев. Размышления.
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from us
