Но как это можно сделать? Начать платить за тяжёлый труд на производстве сопоставимую зарплату, как в доставке, например? А если принимать на работу мигрантов, то исключительно по целевому набору и по контракту?
Нет, ну так можно договориться до того, что и в МВД, и в МО РФ надо поднимать зарплаты. Хотя бы до уровня всё тех же курьеров. А где такое видано, может, лучше запретим?
Но как это можно сделать? Начать платить за тяжёлый труд на производстве сопоставимую зарплату, как в доставке, например? А если принимать на работу мигрантов, то исключительно по целевому набору и по контракту?
Нет, ну так можно договориться до того, что и в МВД, и в МО РФ надо поднимать зарплаты. Хотя бы до уровня всё тех же курьеров. А где такое видано, может, лучше запретим?
Apparently upbeat developments in Russia's discussions with Ukraine helped at least temporarily send investors back into risk assets. Russian President Vladimir Putin said during a meeting with his Belarusian counterpart Alexander Lukashenko that there were "certain positive developments" occurring in the talks with Ukraine, according to a transcript of their meeting. Putin added that discussions were happening "almost on a daily basis." Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. That hurt tech stocks. For the past few weeks, the 10-year yield has traded between 1.72% and 2%, as traders moved into the bond for safety when Russia headlines were ugly—and out of it when headlines improved. Now, the yield is touching its pandemic-era high. If the yield breaks above that level, that could signal that it’s on a sustainable path higher. Higher long-dated bond yields make future profits less valuable—and many tech companies are valued on the basis of profits forecast for many years in the future. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from us