Красуцкий Б.В. Краткий определитель грибных жуков. Учебно-методическое пособие для студентов биологических специальностей вузов – Челябинск: Изд-во ЧГПУ, 2007. – 138 с.: ил. #книганедели
Первое в системе российского высшего образования руководство к собиранию и определению жесткокрылых насекомых (Coleoptera, Insecta), связанных в биологии с грибами (преимущественно, ксилотрофными). Даны рекомендации по сбору грибных жуков и составлению их коллекций. Предложены определительные таблицы 188 видов из 33 семейств, сопровождающиеся иллюстрациями внешнего вида имаго жуков и некоторых основных деталей их морфологии (29 рис.). Диагноз основан на достаточно простых внешних признаках, позволяющих надежно идентифицировать большинство видов без специального исследования гениталий.
Красуцкий Б.В. Краткий определитель грибных жуков. Учебно-методическое пособие для студентов биологических специальностей вузов – Челябинск: Изд-во ЧГПУ, 2007. – 138 с.: ил. #книганедели
Первое в системе российского высшего образования руководство к собиранию и определению жесткокрылых насекомых (Coleoptera, Insecta), связанных в биологии с грибами (преимущественно, ксилотрофными). Даны рекомендации по сбору грибных жуков и составлению их коллекций. Предложены определительные таблицы 188 видов из 33 семейств, сопровождающиеся иллюстрациями внешнего вида имаго жуков и некоторых основных деталей их морфологии (29 рис.). Диагноз основан на достаточно простых внешних признаках, позволяющих надежно идентифицировать большинство видов без специального исследования гениталий.
That hurt tech stocks. For the past few weeks, the 10-year yield has traded between 1.72% and 2%, as traders moved into the bond for safety when Russia headlines were ugly—and out of it when headlines improved. Now, the yield is touching its pandemic-era high. If the yield breaks above that level, that could signal that it’s on a sustainable path higher. Higher long-dated bond yields make future profits less valuable—and many tech companies are valued on the basis of profits forecast for many years in the future. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later.
from us
