А может прав был Иркутск политический, написавший про иск ИЭСК к губеру, который помогал составлять профэссор Шишкин? Ох, с огнем играет маэстро юриспруденции, пытаясь усидеть на двух стульях. Сейчас такой накал страстей, что под горячую руку можно попасть. Точно пропуск в правительство заблочат.
А может прав был Иркутск политический, написавший про иск ИЭСК к губеру, который помогал составлять профэссор Шишкин? Ох, с огнем играет маэстро юриспруденции, пытаясь усидеть на двух стульях. Сейчас такой накал страстей, что под горячую руку можно попасть. Точно пропуск в правительство заблочат.
As the war in Ukraine rages, the messaging app Telegram has emerged as the go-to place for unfiltered live war updates for both Ukrainian refugees and increasingly isolated Russians alike. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Telegram users are able to send files of any type up to 2GB each and access them from any device, with no limit on cloud storage, which has made downloading files more popular on the platform. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children.
from us
