Про наши выборы и голосование написано столько, что настряло в зубах. И анекдоты придуманы, и шутки-прибаутки. "Один раз голосуем, пять лет голосим", "Голосуй не голосуй всё равно получишь х@й". А когда идёт война и твоя страна к тому же агрессор, а ее президент военный преступник, то никчемность референдума особо очевидна. Да и ничем он не отличается от 2004 года. 18 лет прошло, а статья из "Альтанки" актуальна по сей день🤬
Про наши выборы и голосование написано столько, что настряло в зубах. И анекдоты придуманы, и шутки-прибаутки. "Один раз голосуем, пять лет голосим", "Голосуй не голосуй всё равно получишь х@й". А когда идёт война и твоя страна к тому же агрессор, а ее президент военный преступник, то никчемность референдума особо очевидна. Да и ничем он не отличается от 2004 года. 18 лет прошло, а статья из "Альтанки" актуальна по сей день🤬
He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. As the war in Ukraine rages, the messaging app Telegram has emerged as the go-to place for unfiltered live war updates for both Ukrainian refugees and increasingly isolated Russians alike. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Since January 2022, the SC has received a total of 47 complaints and enquiries on illegal investment schemes promoted through Telegram. These fraudulent schemes offer non-existent investment opportunities, promising very attractive and risk-free returns within a short span of time. They commonly offer unrealistic returns of as high as 1,000% within 24 hours or even within a few hours.
from br
