Наконец, действительно забавная деталь: статья сопровождается в качестве иллюстрации фотографией фрагмента рукописи на санскрите, которая была помещена вверх ногами; это, несомненно, всего лишь оплошность при вёрстке, но в некотором роде это имеет символическое значение, поскольку востоковеды слишком часто интерпретируют тексты наоборот!
Отзыв на работу Луи Рену L’Inde et la France [Индия и Франция] в журнале Hind
Наконец, действительно забавная деталь: статья сопровождается в качестве иллюстрации фотографией фрагмента рукописи на санскрите, которая была помещена вверх ногами; это, несомненно, всего лишь оплошность при вёрстке, но в некотором роде это имеет символическое значение, поскольку востоковеды слишком часто интерпретируют тексты наоборот!
Отзыв на работу Луи Рену L’Inde et la France [Индия и Франция] в журнале Hind
On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. "There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from br
