Орешник, значит. У моего любимого Саши Лаэртского есть песня про орешник. Альбом с актуальным названием «Повод для оптимизма».
Звенит листвой осенний лес И под орешником облезшим Нашли с Маринкой труп мышиный Что шкуркой серой был приметен Маринка - добрая герла Слезу пустила и сказала "Давай схороним это тело" И тотчас место указала Звенит листвой осенний лес С войны оставшаяся мина Мышиный труп метнув в орешник Меня с Маринкой разнесла.
Орешник, значит. У моего любимого Саши Лаэртского есть песня про орешник. Альбом с актуальным названием «Повод для оптимизма».
Звенит листвой осенний лес И под орешником облезшим Нашли с Маринкой труп мышиный Что шкуркой серой был приметен Маринка - добрая герла Слезу пустила и сказала "Давай схороним это тело" И тотчас место указала Звенит листвой осенний лес С войны оставшаяся мина Мышиный труп метнув в орешник Меня с Маринкой разнесла.
BY Роман Хоменко
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government.
from br
