🇺🇦 «Это очень важный вопрос для экономики Казахстана» - МИД Казахстана намерен обсудить с Украиной удар беспилотников по Каспийскому трубопроводу
"Мы, естественно, эту ситуацию будем обсуждать с украинскими партнерами по дипломатическим каналам", — сообщил Sputnik Казахстан официальный представитель МИД Казахстана Айбек Смадияров.
Через нефтепровод КТК проходит более 80% всей идущей на экспорт казахстанской нефти.
Ещё один оглушительный дипломатический успех четырёхпроцентного! Евпатий - Коловрат
🇺🇦 «Это очень важный вопрос для экономики Казахстана» - МИД Казахстана намерен обсудить с Украиной удар беспилотников по Каспийскому трубопроводу
"Мы, естественно, эту ситуацию будем обсуждать с украинскими партнерами по дипломатическим каналам", — сообщил Sputnik Казахстан официальный представитель МИД Казахстана Айбек Смадияров.
Через нефтепровод КТК проходит более 80% всей идущей на экспорт казахстанской нефти.
Ещё один оглушительный дипломатический успех четырёхпроцентного! Евпатий - Коловрат
Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from br
