Подписан закон, предусматривающий создание в Союзном государстве единой системы обязательного страхования гражданской ответственности владельцев транспортных средств http://kremlin.ru/acts/news/75726
Владимир Путин подписал Федеральный закон «Об обязательном страховании гражданской ответственности владельцев транспортных средств».
Подписан закон, предусматривающий создание в Союзном государстве единой системы обязательного страхования гражданской ответственности владельцев транспортных средств http://kremlin.ru/acts/news/75726
Владимир Путин подписал Федеральный закон «Об обязательном страховании гражданской ответственности владельцев транспортных средств».
BY Президент РФ
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government.
from br
