مليشيا الجنجويد تنهب سيارات وبيوت المواطنين عنوة وتحت التهديد .. والجيش يتفنن وينهب جيوب المواطنين بصورة مقننة عن طريق زيادة "الكارتيل" المتحكم في الدولة لأسعار البتروليات والخبز والدواء. والمواطن أسير بين كارتيل الجيش ومليشياه .. في رسالة عنوانها ما الفرق بين ناهب وناهب؟ #السودان
مليشيا الجنجويد تنهب سيارات وبيوت المواطنين عنوة وتحت التهديد .. والجيش يتفنن وينهب جيوب المواطنين بصورة مقننة عن طريق زيادة "الكارتيل" المتحكم في الدولة لأسعار البتروليات والخبز والدواء. والمواطن أسير بين كارتيل الجيش ومليشياه .. في رسالة عنوانها ما الفرق بين ناهب وناهب؟ #السودان
BY إنعكاس
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. READ MORE The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice.
from br
