Warning: file_put_contents(aCache/aDaily/post/SNV_7/--): Failed to open stream: No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 СНВ | Telegram Webview: SNV_7/1776 -
🇧🇾 Внимательно наблюдаю за судебным процессом в отношении К.Смовского.
🙏Мне было важно и приятно услышать слова благодарности от представителей органов прокуратуры Республики Беларусь за некоторый вклад в расследование дела этого нацистского пособника
🇧🇾 Внимательно наблюдаю за судебным процессом в отношении К.Смовского.
🙏Мне было важно и приятно услышать слова благодарности от представителей органов прокуратуры Республики Беларусь за некоторый вклад в расследование дела этого нацистского пособника
In 2014, Pavel Durov fled the country after allies of the Kremlin took control of the social networking site most know just as VK. Russia's intelligence agency had asked Durov to turn over the data of anti-Kremlin protesters. Durov refused to do so. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from br
