Kann das sein, dass diese Zahlen (weltweit) realistisch sind? Schreibt eure Meinung in die Kommentare.
Die Aufklärung der Restriktionen und Verbrechen der Corona-Zeit ist eine unserer wichtigsten Aufgaben, denn die Säule der Freiheit in unserer Satzung und unserem Logo kommt nicht von ungefähr… Unsere Freiheitsrechte stehen im Grundgesetz. Wenn wir als dieBasis angeblich „rääächts“ sein sollen (Wikipedia lässt grüßen...) , dann wäre es unser Grundgesetz ja auch.
Kann das sein, dass diese Zahlen (weltweit) realistisch sind? Schreibt eure Meinung in die Kommentare.
Die Aufklärung der Restriktionen und Verbrechen der Corona-Zeit ist eine unserer wichtigsten Aufgaben, denn die Säule der Freiheit in unserer Satzung und unserem Logo kommt nicht von ungefähr… Unsere Freiheitsrechte stehen im Grundgesetz. Wenn wir als dieBasis angeblich „rääächts“ sein sollen (Wikipedia lässt grüßen...) , dann wäre es unser Grundgesetz ja auch.
🟦🟩🟥🟧
BY ⏩ Sven Lingreen (BuVo IIII) ⏪
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." As such, the SC would like to remind investors to always exercise caution when evaluating investment opportunities, especially those promising unrealistically high returns with little or no risk. Investors should also never deposit money into someone’s personal bank account if instructed. Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities. In a message on his Telegram channel recently recounting the episode, Durov wrote: "I lost my company and my home, but would do it again – without hesitation."
from br
