💢اطلاعیه ✍به گزارش مفدا علوم توانبخشی و سلامت اجتماعی؛ قابل توجه دانشجویان کارشناسی ارشد جديد الورود وزارت علوم دانشگاه؛ کسانی که در سامانه هم آوا ثبت نام غیر حضوری خود را انجام داده اند، می توانند با مراجعه به سایت بوستان👇 http://boostan.uswr.ac.ir فرآیند ثبت نام خود را تکمیل نمایند.
💢اطلاعیه ✍به گزارش مفدا علوم توانبخشی و سلامت اجتماعی؛ قابل توجه دانشجویان کارشناسی ارشد جديد الورود وزارت علوم دانشگاه؛ کسانی که در سامانه هم آوا ثبت نام غیر حضوری خود را انجام داده اند، می توانند با مراجعه به سایت بوستان👇 http://boostan.uswr.ac.ir فرآیند ثبت نام خود را تکمیل نمایند.
In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Ukrainian forces successfully attacked Russian vehicles in the capital city of Kyiv thanks to a public tip made through the encrypted messaging app Telegram, Ukraine's top law-enforcement agency said on Tuesday. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations.
from br
