Все смешалось в голове напомаженного педика. В одну кучу недоумок всех собрал. Так распереживался о чубатых любителях Гитлера и песьего корма😁 мамкин нацик не знает ни истории, ни религии. Типичный комнатный сатанист, типа ублюдка Журавеля. Бодливой корове Бог рогов не дал, отправляльщик обоссанный 😁
Все смешалось в голове напомаженного педика. В одну кучу недоумок всех собрал. Так распереживался о чубатых любителях Гитлера и песьего корма😁 мамкин нацик не знает ни истории, ни религии. Типичный комнатный сатанист, типа ублюдка Журавеля. Бодливой корове Бог рогов не дал, отправляльщик обоссанный 😁
Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities.
from br
