Brian Cates @drawandstrike There are only 2 possibilities when Rience Priebus says to @GenFlynn that he and others were shown a document by then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and Deputy AG Sally Yates that showed Flynn discussing sanctions with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.
Because the actual transcripts of the phone calls **clearly show Flynn never discussed any sanctions**...
1. McCabe and Yates showed Priebus and others a FAKE DOCUMENT that made a false claim
or
2. Priebus is not telling the truth when he told Flynn he and others [presumably Trump and Pence among them] were shown such a document by McCabe and Yates.
I am **really hoping** once @PamBondi is running the DOJ and @Kash_Patel is in charge of the FBI, SOMEBODY can get to the bottom of this.
❓Does that faked document claiming Flynn discussed sanctions actually exist?
❓Or did Priebus just make it up?
❗️INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW.
Since this mythical 'Logan Act violation' was the impetus for Flynn's firing and then his more than 3 years prosecution by the FBI/DOJ/Mueller Special Counsel for supposedly lying to federal agents about discussing those sanctions, and this supposed document was flashed around to justify Flynn's firing, whether or not it ACTUALLY EXISTS is a very important question.
Somebody not only had to engage in a federal crime by leaking classified intelligence transcripts of the Flynn/Kislyak phone calls...
❗️THERE WAS NOTHING ACTUALLY IN THE PHONE CALL TRANSCRIPTS THAT COULD BE USED TO ATTACK FLYNN WITH.
So somebody - we still don't know who - was forced to get EXCEEDINGLY CLEVER here to present the **appearance** that Flynn had discussed sanctions with Kislyak when in fact, he hadn't.
So the criminal leak of the classified transcripts is COMPOUNDED by criminal manufacture of a fake 'crime' to prosecute Flynn for:
Supposedly lying to two FBI agents about sanctions when it is now an uncontestable matter of PUBLIC RECORD that Flynn did not lie to them.
I will not leave this alone. Someone is going to end up paying for both the criminal leak and the false accusation that wasn't even in the leaked transcripts.
Brian Cates @drawandstrike There are only 2 possibilities when Rience Priebus says to @GenFlynn that he and others were shown a document by then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and Deputy AG Sally Yates that showed Flynn discussing sanctions with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.
Because the actual transcripts of the phone calls **clearly show Flynn never discussed any sanctions**...
1. McCabe and Yates showed Priebus and others a FAKE DOCUMENT that made a false claim
or
2. Priebus is not telling the truth when he told Flynn he and others [presumably Trump and Pence among them] were shown such a document by McCabe and Yates.
I am **really hoping** once @PamBondi is running the DOJ and @Kash_Patel is in charge of the FBI, SOMEBODY can get to the bottom of this.
❓Does that faked document claiming Flynn discussed sanctions actually exist?
❓Or did Priebus just make it up?
❗️INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW.
Since this mythical 'Logan Act violation' was the impetus for Flynn's firing and then his more than 3 years prosecution by the FBI/DOJ/Mueller Special Counsel for supposedly lying to federal agents about discussing those sanctions, and this supposed document was flashed around to justify Flynn's firing, whether or not it ACTUALLY EXISTS is a very important question.
Somebody not only had to engage in a federal crime by leaking classified intelligence transcripts of the Flynn/Kislyak phone calls...
❗️THERE WAS NOTHING ACTUALLY IN THE PHONE CALL TRANSCRIPTS THAT COULD BE USED TO ATTACK FLYNN WITH.
So somebody - we still don't know who - was forced to get EXCEEDINGLY CLEVER here to present the **appearance** that Flynn had discussed sanctions with Kislyak when in fact, he hadn't.
So the criminal leak of the classified transcripts is COMPOUNDED by criminal manufacture of a fake 'crime' to prosecute Flynn for:
Supposedly lying to two FBI agents about sanctions when it is now an uncontestable matter of PUBLIC RECORD that Flynn did not lie to them.
I will not leave this alone. Someone is going to end up paying for both the criminal leak and the false accusation that wasn't even in the leaked transcripts.
DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. False news often spreads via public groups, or chats, with potentially fatal effects. "The inflation fire was already hot and now with war-driven inflation added to the mix, it will grow even hotter, setting off a scramble by the world’s central banks to pull back their stimulus earlier than expected," Chris Rupkey, chief economist at FWDBONDS, wrote in an email. "A spike in inflation rates has preceded economic recessions historically and this time prices have soared to levels that once again pose a threat to growth." Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war.
from br
