Трансляцию юбилейной 🥰 «Ночи выборов» посмотрели уже более 1 млн человек!
Зрители нашей трансляции — не только граждане из регионов России, но и представители различных стран всего земного шара.
Несмотря на попытки недружественных стран дискредитировать нашу избирательную кампанию, каждый желающий имеет возможность узнать об актуальной политической повестке России. Оставайтесь с нами, ночь продолжается !
Трансляцию юбилейной 🥰 «Ночи выборов» посмотрели уже более 1 млн человек!
Зрители нашей трансляции — не только граждане из регионов России, но и представители различных стран всего земного шара.
Несмотря на попытки недружественных стран дискредитировать нашу избирательную кампанию, каждый желающий имеет возможность узнать об актуальной политической повестке России. Оставайтесь с нами, ночь продолжается !
Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee.
from br
