🇷🇺🇰🇵Андрей Белоусов назвал договор с КНДР о всеобъемлющем стратегическом партнерствеважнейшим результатом исторической встречиВладимира Путина и Ким Чен Ына
Министр обороны России отметил, что этот документ призван стабилизировать обстановку в Северо-Восточной Азии и снизить риск войны на полуострове, в том числе с применением ядерного оружия.
Также глава Минобороны РФ рассчитывает на тесное и плодотворное взаимодействие с корейскими товарищами.
🇷🇺🇰🇵Андрей Белоусов назвал договор с КНДР о всеобъемлющем стратегическом партнерствеважнейшим результатом исторической встречиВладимира Путина и Ким Чен Ына
Министр обороны России отметил, что этот документ призван стабилизировать обстановку в Северо-Восточной Азии и снизить риск войны на полуострове, в том числе с применением ядерного оружия.
Также глава Минобороны РФ рассчитывает на тесное и плодотворное взаимодействие с корейскими товарищами.
BY БЫСТРО
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. In a message on his Telegram channel recently recounting the episode, Durov wrote: "I lost my company and my home, but would do it again – without hesitation." On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from br
