WP отказалась от публичной поддержки кого-либо кандидатов в президенты по решению владельца, одного из богатейших людей планеты Джеффа Безоса. В Los Angeles Times решение тоже принял владелец, миллиардер Патрик Синьсян, после чего из издания уволилась глава редакционного совета Мариэль Гарса.
The Washington Post уже потеряла от этого 8% читателей,200 тысяч человек. Но ничего не поделать: миллиардеры страхуются, знают, насколько Трамп мстителен и мелочен. Если вдруг победит, может и припомнить.
WP отказалась от публичной поддержки кого-либо кандидатов в президенты по решению владельца, одного из богатейших людей планеты Джеффа Безоса. В Los Angeles Times решение тоже принял владелец, миллиардер Патрик Синьсян, после чего из издания уволилась глава редакционного совета Мариэль Гарса.
The Washington Post уже потеряла от этого 8% читателей,200 тысяч человек. Но ничего не поделать: миллиардеры страхуются, знают, насколько Трамп мстителен и мелочен. Если вдруг победит, может и припомнить.
Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. "There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. In December 2021, Sebi officials had conducted a search and seizure operation at the premises of certain persons carrying out similar manipulative activities through Telegram channels.
from br
