оставим в комментариях ссылки на мои публикации про концлагерь СБУ, деятельность которого наши правители обеспечивали за счет американской помощи.
Тот самый концлагерь, про который дважды писали в своих отчетах ООН, и который Малюк вместе с Зеленским и Бакановым - использовали чтобы запугивать людей и клеймить всех русскими агентами.
оставим в комментариях ссылки на мои публикации про концлагерь СБУ, деятельность которого наши правители обеспечивали за счет американской помощи.
Тот самый концлагерь, про который дважды писали в своих отчетах ООН, и который Малюк вместе с Зеленским и Бакановым - использовали чтобы запугивать людей и клеймить всех русскими агентами.
Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. The fake Zelenskiy account reached 20,000 followers on Telegram before it was shut down, a remedial action that experts say is all too rare. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from br
