В США произошел дикий случай с белкой Арахисом. 8 лет назад американец нашёл больного бельчонка, у которого мать-белку задавила машина, и выходил его. Бельчонок поправилась и жил у него дома. Кто-то из аудитории Инстаграм увидел и пожаловался властям. Дальше служба по охране природы провела операцию по изъятию белки и енота, который тоже жил у мужчины - ворвались к нему в дом, изъяли белку, изъяли енота.
Изъяли и убили! Усыпили. Потому что по законам штата Нью-Йорк нельзя дома содержать «диких животных».
В США произошел дикий случай с белкой Арахисом. 8 лет назад американец нашёл больного бельчонка, у которого мать-белку задавила машина, и выходил его. Бельчонок поправилась и жил у него дома. Кто-то из аудитории Инстаграм увидел и пожаловался властям. Дальше служба по охране природы провела операцию по изъятию белки и енота, который тоже жил у мужчины - ворвались к нему в дом, изъяли белку, изъяли енота.
Изъяли и убили! Усыпили. Потому что по законам штата Нью-Йорк нельзя дома содержать «диких животных».
Евгений Линин
BY Евгений Линин
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee.
from br
