این سؤالی را که امروز رئیس‌جمهور پرسیده است، سال‌ها متخصصان منابع آب از سیاستمداران پرسیده‌اند و جوابی جز بی‌اعتنایی نشنیده‌اند. انشالله آقای #پزشکیان این سؤال را با جدیت مطرح می‌کنند و حامیان همه سیاست‌ها و طرح‌ها را وادار می‌کنند پاسخ‌گو باشند.
این سؤالی را که امروز رئیس‌جمهور پرسیده است، سال‌ها متخصصان منابع آب از سیاستمداران پرسیده‌اند و جوابی جز بی‌اعتنایی نشنیده‌اند. انشالله آقای #پزشکیان این سؤال را با جدیت مطرح می‌کنند و حامیان همه سیاست‌ها و طرح‌ها را وادار می‌کنند پاسخ‌گو باشند.
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. "There is a significant risk of insider threat or hacking of Telegram systems that could expose all of these chats to the Russian government," said Eva Galperin with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has called for Telegram to improve its privacy practices. In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. "Russians are really disconnected from the reality of what happening to their country," Andrey said. "So Telegram has become essential for understanding what's going on to the Russian-speaking world." Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from br
