Как вы видите в пидор-нарезке сверху, укропы считали нормой вытащить спг-9 и в упор безнаказанно расстрелять позиции российских войск на заводе. Весной 2024 они не поняли, что правила изменились.
Командиром зашел Белый....Отряд Шторм стал воевать, а не выхватывать.
Расчет был нейтрализован. Пока не подвезли новый, спг-9 больше не стрелял.
Как вы видите в пидор-нарезке сверху, укропы считали нормой вытащить спг-9 и в упор безнаказанно расстрелять позиции российских войск на заводе. Весной 2024 они не поняли, что правила изменились.
Командиром зашел Белый....Отряд Шторм стал воевать, а не выхватывать.
Расчет был нейтрализован. Пока не подвезли новый, спг-9 больше не стрелял.
DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from br
