Глава офиса Зеленского потребовал вернуть Украине границы 2022 года — именно это должно стать «отправной точкой» мирных переговоров.
«Плодотворные переговоры возможны только тогда, когда все воюющие стороны имеют желание прекратить боевые действия. Кроме того, ситуацию необходимо вернуть хотя бы к состоянию на 23 февраля 2022 года», — заявил Андрей Ермак.
Неделю назад президент Украины признал, что у страны нет сил военным путем вернуть границы 1991 года. При этом Киев юридически не намерен отказываться от утраченных территорий.
Глава офиса Зеленского потребовал вернуть Украине границы 2022 года — именно это должно стать «отправной точкой» мирных переговоров.
«Плодотворные переговоры возможны только тогда, когда все воюющие стороны имеют желание прекратить боевые действия. Кроме того, ситуацию необходимо вернуть хотя бы к состоянию на 23 февраля 2022 года», — заявил Андрей Ермак.
Неделю назад президент Украины признал, что у страны нет сил военным путем вернуть границы 1991 года. При этом Киев юридически не намерен отказываться от утраченных территорий.
BY БО | Новости
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from br
