Дни республики Адыгея в Совете Федерации начались с расширенных заседаний комитетов Совета Федерации. Делегацию от региона возглавляет Глава Мурат Кумпилов. Сегодня обсудили актуальные вопросы развития агропромышленного комплекса, важность создания инфраструктуры для экономического развития и ряд инициатив в социальной сфере. В Москве работает наша съемочная группа. С подробностями Алла Панеш.
Дни республики Адыгея в Совете Федерации начались с расширенных заседаний комитетов Совета Федерации. Делегацию от региона возглавляет Глава Мурат Кумпилов. Сегодня обсудили актуальные вопросы развития агропромышленного комплекса, важность создания инфраструктуры для экономического развития и ряд инициатив в социальной сфере. В Москве работает наша съемочная группа. С подробностями Алла Панеш.
BY ГТРК Адыгея
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. The Security Service of Ukraine said in a tweet that it was able to effectively target Russian convoys near Kyiv because of messages sent to an official Telegram bot account called "STOP Russian War." Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from br
