10 марта 1940 года умер #Булгаков. В 2013 году как раз на эту дату я был в киевском доме-музее Михаила Афанасьевича и сфотографировал (на мыльницу, качество не взыщите, такие были времена) удивительный артефакт советской эпохи: "Мастера и Маргариту", переписанную пером от руки.
Через несколько лет, уже после Майдана, я интересовался у киевских знакомых, сохранилась ли рукопись в экспозиции. Сказали что нет. Знал бы, спиздил бы сам.
10 марта 1940 года умер #Булгаков. В 2013 году как раз на эту дату я был в киевском доме-музее Михаила Афанасьевича и сфотографировал (на мыльницу, качество не взыщите, такие были времена) удивительный артефакт советской эпохи: "Мастера и Маргариту", переписанную пером от руки.
Через несколько лет, уже после Майдана, я интересовался у киевских знакомых, сохранилась ли рукопись в экспозиции. Сказали что нет. Знал бы, спиздил бы сам.
BY Кино и немцы
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from br
