Вчера отчёт пропустил. Отчитываться по сути было не о чем, зато сегодня обработал полтора "съёмочных дня", вроде как даже заметить на экране по идее можно. Ну и как и в прошлый отчёт, у меня для вас фрагментик. Он, скорее всего, в обзор не попадёт, а мне показался смешным.
Вчера отчёт пропустил. Отчитываться по сути было не о чем, зато сегодня обработал полтора "съёмочных дня", вроде как даже заметить на экране по идее можно. Ну и как и в прошлый отчёт, у меня для вас фрагментик. Он, скорее всего, в обзор не попадёт, а мне показался смешным.
Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea.
from br
