Они пришли на подмогу полюбившимся нам шелковым шарфикам и платочкам, которые мы также продолжим использовать в лучках.
Носим не только с рубашками, но и с блузами, топами, жилетами и джемперам 👌
Инфлюенсеры чаще выбирают яркие, принтованные галстуки, и носят их нестандартным способом. Небрежно накидывают на шею, как шарфик, подвязывают, как бант, или используют вместо ремня.
Они пришли на подмогу полюбившимся нам шелковым шарфикам и платочкам, которые мы также продолжим использовать в лучках.
Носим не только с рубашками, но и с блузами, топами, жилетами и джемперам 👌
Инфлюенсеры чаще выбирают яркие, принтованные галстуки, и носят их нестандартным способом. Небрежно накидывают на шею, как шарфик, подвязывают, как бант, или используют вместо ремня.
Artem Kliuchnikov and his family fled Ukraine just days before the Russian invasion. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from br
