4 декабря официально принято заказывать подарки у Деда Мороза, вы знали? 🎄
Спасибо крёстной Гришки за простой, как три копейки, адвент-календарь, но самый чудесный и удобный! ❤️ По его заданию мы уже написали письмо Деду Морозу, а сегодня отправляем его в дальний ящик Великий Устюг! #семейный_досуг
Интересно, что за подарок Гриша заказал у Деда Мороза? Идём искать ответ в комментариях! Заодно обсудим, что Ваши детки заказали у ДМ? 🎁
4 декабря официально принято заказывать подарки у Деда Мороза, вы знали? 🎄
Спасибо крёстной Гришки за простой, как три копейки, адвент-календарь, но самый чудесный и удобный! ❤️ По его заданию мы уже написали письмо Деду Морозу, а сегодня отправляем его в дальний ящик Великий Устюг! #семейный_досуг
Интересно, что за подарок Гриша заказал у Деда Мороза? Идём искать ответ в комментариях! Заодно обсудим, что Ваши детки заказали у ДМ? 🎁
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government.
from br
