В МВД рейды в московских клубах объяснили борьбой с «пропагандой ЛГБТ»
ТАСС со ссылкой на пресс-службу ведомства пишет, что «в клубе на Складочной улице осуществлялась пропаганда ЛГБТ». Что именно происходило в заведении, не уточняется. Силовики в ходе рейда «изъяли смартфоны, ноутбуки, видеокамеры и иные предметы». Представитель ведомства подтвердил, что рейды прошли и в других клубах.
Что за заведение находится на Складочной улице, ведомство не уточнило. Источник «Интерфакса» утверждает, что речь идет о клубе Inferno Night. До этого о рейдах сообщали посетители клуба Arma (бывший «Мутабор») и бара Mono.
В МВД рейды в московских клубах объяснили борьбой с «пропагандой ЛГБТ»
ТАСС со ссылкой на пресс-службу ведомства пишет, что «в клубе на Складочной улице осуществлялась пропаганда ЛГБТ». Что именно происходило в заведении, не уточняется. Силовики в ходе рейда «изъяли смартфоны, ноутбуки, видеокамеры и иные предметы». Представитель ведомства подтвердил, что рейды прошли и в других клубах.
Что за заведение находится на Складочной улице, ведомство не уточнило. Источник «Интерфакса» утверждает, что речь идет о клубе Inferno Night. До этого о рейдах сообщали посетители клуба Arma (бывший «Мутабор») и бара Mono.
BY Медуза — LIVE
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
"He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup.
from br
