✅+ для каналов, посвящённых антивоенным исполнителям/тематике
DNI (do not interact — отказ от взаимодействия): — поддержка, оправдывание войны/власти РФ, каналы, направленные на восхваление публично высказавшихся о поддержке войны; — каналы, направленные на выражение ненависти к людям/группам людей; — база (кликабельно).
🕊️ повторный вп через неделю 🕊️ чистим через 8+ часов!
✅+ для каналов, посвящённых антивоенным исполнителям/тематике
DNI (do not interact — отказ от взаимодействия): — поддержка, оправдывание войны/власти РФ, каналы, направленные на восхваление публично высказавшихся о поддержке войны; — каналы, направленные на выражение ненависти к людям/группам людей; — база (кликабельно).
🕊️ повторный вп через неделю 🕊️ чистим через 8+ часов!
For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. The regulator took order for the search and seizure operation from Judge Purushottam B Jadhav, Sebi Special Judge / Additional Sessions Judge. The account, "War on Fakes," was created on February 24, the same day Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a "special military operation" and troops began invading Ukraine. The page is rife with disinformation, according to The Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, which studies digital extremism and published a report examining the channel. Soloviev also promoted the channel in a post he shared on his own Telegram, which has 580,000 followers. The post recommended his viewers subscribe to "War on Fakes" in a time of fake news. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from br
