Те, кто в свое время устраивал большой террор и создавали ГУЛАГ, тоже наивно полагали, что их это не коснется, что у стенки стоять и в бараке лежать будут другие, "кто вредит нашей Родне здесь внутри". Но когда они сделали свое черное дело, пришли и за ними...
Те, кто в свое время устраивал большой террор и создавали ГУЛАГ, тоже наивно полагали, что их это не коснется, что у стенки стоять и в бараке лежать будут другие, "кто вредит нашей Родне здесь внутри". Но когда они сделали свое черное дело, пришли и за ними...
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." In a message on his Telegram channel recently recounting the episode, Durov wrote: "I lost my company and my home, but would do it again – without hesitation." The Security Service of Ukraine said in a tweet that it was able to effectively target Russian convoys near Kyiv because of messages sent to an official Telegram bot account called "STOP Russian War."
from br
