❗️Друзья, напоминаем также, что завтра состоится очередное заседание по делу художника Павла Крисевича
«При повторном рассмотрении дела судебная машина работает быстрее и уже в среду 27 сентября состоятся прения и последнее слово», – пишет группа поддержки Паши.
📍27 сентября, 11:00 📍Тверской районный суд Москвы, (зал 455, судья Криворучко А.В.)
Каланчевская, 43а
Приходите поддержать.
❤️Паше Крисевичу и другим политзаключённым - лучи поддержки, а всем нашим подписчикам - спокойной ночи и мирного неба над головой.
❗️Друзья, напоминаем также, что завтра состоится очередное заседание по делу художника Павла Крисевича
«При повторном рассмотрении дела судебная машина работает быстрее и уже в среду 27 сентября состоятся прения и последнее слово», – пишет группа поддержки Паши.
📍27 сентября, 11:00 📍Тверской районный суд Москвы, (зал 455, судья Криворучко А.В.)
Каланчевская, 43а
Приходите поддержать.
❤️Паше Крисевичу и другим политзаключённым - лучи поддержки, а всем нашим подписчикам - спокойной ночи и мирного неба над головой.
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips.
from br
