Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 16185 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 РБК Вино | Telegram Webview: rbc_wine/1169 -
🎄Скоро новый год, оригинальные адвент-календари есть и для ценителей вина – каждый день мини-бутылочка, коктейль или игристое для новогоднего настроения🥂
🍷Как вам?
Видео: ingoodtastewines / sugarfina / sylranchwinery / vinoteket / Instagram (входит в корпорацию Meta, признана экстремистской и запрещена в России)
🎄Скоро новый год, оригинальные адвент-календари есть и для ценителей вина – каждый день мини-бутылочка, коктейль или игристое для новогоднего настроения🥂
🍷Как вам?
Видео: ingoodtastewines / sugarfina / sylranchwinery / vinoteket / Instagram (входит в корпорацию Meta, признана экстремистской и запрещена в России)
Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. 'Wild West' At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from br
