📸Краткий фоторепортаж из конференц-зала Астраханского областного суда, где собирались недовольные астраханцы, пришедшие поддержать инициативную группу, подавшую иск на отмену скандального решения Городской Думы Астрахани о повышении налоговых ставок на недвижимость
📸Краткий фоторепортаж из конференц-зала Астраханского областного суда, где собирались недовольные астраханцы, пришедшие поддержать инициативную группу, подавшую иск на отмену скандального решения Городской Думы Астрахани о повышении налоговых ставок на недвижимость
"Russians are really disconnected from the reality of what happening to their country," Andrey said. "So Telegram has become essential for understanding what's going on to the Russian-speaking world." In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights.
from br