Что такое "фейки" по версии таджикских русорезов, прекрасно известно. В канале таджикского МИД до сих пор висит сообщение, что участие таджиков в массовой резне в "Крокусе" - ложь и провокация. То есть обезумевшие от русской крови ваххабиты не удалили сообщение даже после того, как стала известна вся правда. А лавромид...а что лавромид? Он завсегда подмахнёт, раздвинет, подставит, проглотит, обтечёт и утрётся. На крайняк скажет, что его обманули.
Что такое "фейки" по версии таджикских русорезов, прекрасно известно. В канале таджикского МИД до сих пор висит сообщение, что участие таджиков в массовой резне в "Крокусе" - ложь и провокация. То есть обезумевшие от русской крови ваххабиты не удалили сообщение даже после того, как стала известна вся правда. А лавромид...а что лавромид? Он завсегда подмахнёт, раздвинет, подставит, проглотит, обтечёт и утрётся. На крайняк скажет, что его обманули.
"He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. In a message on his Telegram channel recently recounting the episode, Durov wrote: "I lost my company and my home, but would do it again – without hesitation." The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych.
from br
