С 7 апреля по 5 мая будет продано иностранной валюты на ₽74,6 млрд — Минфин России
Торги проводятся по причине недополучения нефтегазовых доходов. Недостача за апрель составила₽113,6 млрд. Это чуть меньше, чем в прошлом месяце.
Продажа иностранной валюты стала регулярной практикой Минфина для восполнения бюджета. Вероятно, проблема недополучения средств от экспорта энергоресурсов не решится в ближайшее время. Тем не менее ситуация явно улучшится на фоне роста цен на черноезолото и благодаря новой схеме налогообложения в нефтянойотрасли.
С 7 апреля по 5 мая будет продано иностранной валюты на ₽74,6 млрд — Минфин России
Торги проводятся по причине недополучения нефтегазовых доходов. Недостача за апрель составила₽113,6 млрд. Это чуть меньше, чем в прошлом месяце.
Продажа иностранной валюты стала регулярной практикой Минфина для восполнения бюджета. Вероятно, проблема недополучения средств от экспорта энергоресурсов не решится в ближайшее время. Тем не менее ситуация явно улучшится на фоне роста цен на черноезолото и благодаря новой схеме налогообложения в нефтянойотрасли.
Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from br
