شاعران را گمراهان پيروى مىكنند. آيا نديدى كه آنان در هر وادى سرگشته مىروند؟ و مطالبى مىگويند كه به آن عمل نمىكنند؟
( اگر به حرفهایشان عمل کنند سنگ روی سنگ بندنمیشود ، همان بر سر جهان میاید که هایدگر و حزبش بر سر آلمان آورند ، و #فردید با افکارش بر سر ایران آورد ، شعر و استعاره و ابهام ارزشش باینست که چندان جدی گرفته نشود )
شاعران را گمراهان پيروى مىكنند. آيا نديدى كه آنان در هر وادى سرگشته مىروند؟ و مطالبى مىگويند كه به آن عمل نمىكنند؟
( اگر به حرفهایشان عمل کنند سنگ روی سنگ بندنمیشود ، همان بر سر جهان میاید که هایدگر و حزبش بر سر آلمان آورند ، و #فردید با افکارش بر سر ایران آورد ، شعر و استعاره و ابهام ارزشش باینست که چندان جدی گرفته نشود )
Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. The picture was mixed overseas. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index fell 1.6%, under pressure from U.S. regulatory scrutiny on New York-listed Chinese companies. Stocks were more buoyant in Europe, where Frankfurt’s DAX surged 1.4%.
from br