✅Рассказываем, что означают слова, ставшие претендентами на звание "Слово года"
Напомним, что в тройку лидеров попали "Вайб", "Скуф" и "Прилет". Кроме того, в список вошли "инсайт", "абьюз", "аскеза", "пов", "сап" и "нормис". А с помощью нейросети мы передали суть слов в картинках.
Наши подписчики предложили нам и свои варианты. Настало время сделать выбор. Голосуйте в опросе ниже👇🏻
✅Рассказываем, что означают слова, ставшие претендентами на звание "Слово года"
Напомним, что в тройку лидеров попали "Вайб", "Скуф" и "Прилет". Кроме того, в список вошли "инсайт", "абьюз", "аскеза", "пов", "сап" и "нормис". А с помощью нейросети мы передали суть слов в картинках.
Наши подписчики предложили нам и свои варианты. Настало время сделать выбор. Голосуйте в опросе ниже👇🏻
In view of this, the regulator has cautioned investors not to rely on such investment tips / advice received through social media platforms. It has also said investors should exercise utmost caution while taking investment decisions while dealing in the securities market. Telegram does offer end-to-end encrypted communications through Secret Chats, but this is not the default setting. Standard conversations use the MTProto method, enabling server-client encryption but with them stored on the server for ease-of-access. This makes using Telegram across multiple devices simple, but also means that the regular Telegram chats you’re having with folks are not as secure as you may believe. "We as Ukrainians believe that the truth is on our side, whether it's truth that you're proclaiming about the war and everything else, why would you want to hide it?," he said. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from br
