Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 8826 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Владимир Лепехин | Канал | Telegram Webview: vladimirlepehin/2360 -
⚡️Смысл обложки The Economist 2025. Шанс для России?
Владимир Лепехин даёт свой комментарий к обложке британского еженедельника "Экономист" с прогнозом развития ситуации в мире на 2025 год, отмечая самое существенное.
⚡️Смысл обложки The Economist 2025. Шанс для России?
Владимир Лепехин даёт свой комментарий к обложке британского еженедельника "Экономист" с прогнозом развития ситуации в мире на 2025 год, отмечая самое существенное.
One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. "There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries.
from br