#происшествия ❗️На муфтия Тюменской области Зинната Садыкова напали с молотком.
Инцидент произошел накануне, когда к Садыкову в кабинет под предлогом обсуждения вопросов деятельности духовного управления мусульман пришел посетитель. Он напал на Садыкова, последний оказал сопротивление. Медики оказали Садыкову помощь, его жизни ничего не угрожает.
#происшествия ❗️На муфтия Тюменской области Зинната Садыкова напали с молотком.
Инцидент произошел накануне, когда к Садыкову в кабинет под предлогом обсуждения вопросов деятельности духовного управления мусульман пришел посетитель. Он напал на Садыкова, последний оказал сопротивление. Медики оказали Садыкову помощь, его жизни ничего не угрожает.
Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough "We're seeing really dramatic moves, and it's all really tied to Ukraine right now, and in a secondary way, in terms of interest rates," Octavio Marenzi, CEO of Opimas, told Yahoo Finance Live on Thursday. "This war in Ukraine is going to give the Fed the ammunition, the cover that it needs, to not raise interest rates too quickly. And I think Jay Powell is a very tepid sort of inflation fighter and he's not going to do as much as he needs to do to get that under control. And this seems like an excuse to kick the can further down the road still and not do too much too soon." Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from br
