Он [Зеленский] едет, он уже в пути, и мы будем подписывать сделку вместе, вероятно, перед медиа, и у нас будет хороший разговор. Нет, мы хотим работать с ним, с президентом Зеленским, и мы будем работать с ним.
Похоже выборы на Украине до окончания войны уже больше не нужны.
Он [Зеленский] едет, он уже в пути, и мы будем подписывать сделку вместе, вероятно, перед медиа, и у нас будет хороший разговор. Нет, мы хотим работать с ним, с президентом Зеленским, и мы будем работать с ним.
Похоже выборы на Украине до окончания войны уже больше не нужны.
"For Telegram, accountability has always been a problem, which is why it was so popular even before the full-scale war with far-right extremists and terrorists from all over the world," she told AFP from her safe house outside the Ukrainian capital. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in a video message on Tuesday that Ukrainian forces "destroy the invaders wherever we can." On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from br
