Дорогие друзья и соратники продолжаем наш сбор на «Мавики 3 pro»🛸для наших бойцов.
Сбор идет очень тяжело, любая помощь сейчас очень важна, 100₽ это тоже помощь, сумма символическая которая доступна для каждого и поможет приобрести для наших бойцов необходимые квадрики «Мавик 3 pro».
Надеемся и на Ваше участие! Спасибо большое каждому, кто вместе с нами приближает долгожданную победу!
Дорогие друзья и соратники продолжаем наш сбор на «Мавики 3 pro»🛸для наших бойцов.
Сбор идет очень тяжело, любая помощь сейчас очень важна, 100₽ это тоже помощь, сумма символическая которая доступна для каждого и поможет приобрести для наших бойцов необходимые квадрики «Мавик 3 pro».
Надеемся и на Ваше участие! Спасибо большое каждому, кто вместе с нами приближает долгожданную победу!
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Founder Pavel Durov says tech is meant to set you free Soloviev also promoted the channel in a post he shared on his own Telegram, which has 580,000 followers. The post recommended his viewers subscribe to "War on Fakes" in a time of fake news. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from br
