Политолог Владимир Гращенков (@thegraschenkov) вслед за «Незыгарем» начал рассуждать на тему «социального иждивенчества». Дескать, трудящееся большинство граждан России хочет все «отнять и поделить» у «вписавшихся в рынок эффективных собственников». Г-н Гращенков, на самом деле, именно кучка «упырей» 30 лет назад отобрала у народа власть и собственность, и поделила их между собой. Национализация - это не «отнять и поделить». Это возвратить народу то, что у него отняли в лихие 90-е!
Политолог Владимир Гращенков (@thegraschenkov) вслед за «Незыгарем» начал рассуждать на тему «социального иждивенчества». Дескать, трудящееся большинство граждан России хочет все «отнять и поделить» у «вписавшихся в рынок эффективных собственников». Г-н Гращенков, на самом деле, именно кучка «упырей» 30 лет назад отобрала у народа власть и собственность, и поделила их между собой. Национализация - это не «отнять и поделить». Это возвратить народу то, что у него отняли в лихие 90-е!
BY Геннадий Зюганов
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Andrey, a Russian entrepreneur living in Brazil who, fearing retaliation, asked that NPR not use his last name, said Telegram has become one of the few places Russians can access independent news about the war. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events."
from br
