Хочется обратиться к людям, которые играют на калькуляторе в Яндекс Go: коллеги-маркетологи и другие неприятные люди, может быть переименуете тарифы в такси? Поездка 45 минут в тарифе «Комфорт+» стоит 2017 рублей, вы охуели? но мне некомфортно! К эконому за 1723 тоже есть вопросы. Спасибо!
Хочется обратиться к людям, которые играют на калькуляторе в Яндекс Go: коллеги-маркетологи и другие неприятные люди, может быть переименуете тарифы в такси? Поездка 45 минут в тарифе «Комфорт+» стоит 2017 рублей, вы охуели? но мне некомфортно! К эконому за 1723 тоже есть вопросы. Спасибо!
BY Живой журнал Жени
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from us
