🇺🇳🇫🇷ООН следит за ситуацией с арестом Дурова во Франции, но пока не располагает комментарием, сообщил офис генсека
Дуров может остаться под стражей до 28 августа, сообщили в прокуратуре Парижа. Там добавили, что дело против Дурова было открыто 8 июля, ему предъявлено обвинение в 12 преступлениях.
🇺🇳🇫🇷ООН следит за ситуацией с арестом Дурова во Франции, но пока не располагает комментарием, сообщил офис генсека
Дуров может остаться под стражей до 28 августа, сообщили в прокуратуре Парижа. Там добавили, что дело против Дурова было открыто 8 июля, ему предъявлено обвинение в 12 преступлениях.
In December 2021, Sebi officials had conducted a search and seizure operation at the premises of certain persons carrying out similar manipulative activities through Telegram channels. The Russian invasion of Ukraine has been a driving force in markets for the past few weeks. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts.
from us
