❗️Алиев: "Одним из моментов, который нас огорчил и удивил, было то, что российские официальные структуры выдвинули версии о взрыве какого-то газового баллона. То есть это открыто показывало, что российская сторона хочет замять вопрос, и это, конечно, никому не делает чести".
❗️Алиев: "Одним из моментов, который нас огорчил и удивил, было то, что российские официальные структуры выдвинули версии о взрыве какого-то газового баллона. То есть это открыто показывало, что российская сторона хочет замять вопрос, и это, конечно, никому не делает чести".
BY АГИТПРОП
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. "Russians are really disconnected from the reality of what happening to their country," Andrey said. "So Telegram has become essential for understanding what's going on to the Russian-speaking world." Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from ca