По мнению Washington Post, среди европейских государств нарастает поддержка идеи переговоров между Киевом и Москвой на принципах "земли за мир". По данным издания, в Западных странах уже нет опасений обсуждать данную инициативу, а также считается, что Украина может передать территории в обмен на гарантии безопасности.
По мнению Washington Post, среди европейских государств нарастает поддержка идеи переговоров между Киевом и Москвой на принципах "земли за мир". По данным издания, в Западных странах уже нет опасений обсуждать данную инициативу, а также считается, что Украина может передать территории в обмен на гарантии безопасности.
Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp. Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed.
from ca
