Путин извинился перед Меркель за напугавшего ее лабрадора Конни в 2007 году
Извинения бывшему канцлеру Германии Ангеле Меркель принес президент России Владимир Путин за эпизод с его собакой на переговорах в Сочи в 2007 году. Путин извинился 28 ноября, отвечая на вопросы журналистов в Астане после встречи лидеров стран ОДКБ.
Российский лидер сообщил, что не знал о страхе Меркель перед собаками, когда в ходе переговоров в Сочи к ним в зал забежал любимый пес российского лидера лабрадор Конни.
Путин извинился перед Меркель за напугавшего ее лабрадора Конни в 2007 году
Извинения бывшему канцлеру Германии Ангеле Меркель принес президент России Владимир Путин за эпизод с его собакой на переговорах в Сочи в 2007 году. Путин извинился 28 ноября, отвечая на вопросы журналистов в Астане после встречи лидеров стран ОДКБ.
Российский лидер сообщил, что не знал о страхе Меркель перед собаками, когда в ходе переговоров в Сочи к ним в зал забежал любимый пес российского лидера лабрадор Конни.
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences.
from ca
