🔸 فردی بالغ بدون بیماری یا مشکل چشمی، توسط چشم‌پزشک یا بینایی‌سنج به دلیل داشتن نمره در چشم توصیه به زدن عینک شده؛ اگر این فرد از عینک استفاده نکند، آیا نمره‌ی چشم او افزایش خواهد یافت؟
🔹خیر استفاده از عینک در چنین فردی صرفا برای راحتی او و داشتن دیدی شفاف‌تر می‌باشد و عدم استفاده از عینک موجب بالاتر رفتن نمره‌ی چشم او نمی‌شود.
🔴 قطعا "موارد خاص که همراه با بیماری زمینه‌ی چشم باشد" و یا "به‌ویژه در دوران کودکی" از این موضوع مستثنی می‌باشد.
🔸 فردی بالغ بدون بیماری یا مشکل چشمی، توسط چشم‌پزشک یا بینایی‌سنج به دلیل داشتن نمره در چشم توصیه به زدن عینک شده؛ اگر این فرد از عینک استفاده نکند، آیا نمره‌ی چشم او افزایش خواهد یافت؟
🔹خیر استفاده از عینک در چنین فردی صرفا برای راحتی او و داشتن دیدی شفاف‌تر می‌باشد و عدم استفاده از عینک موجب بالاتر رفتن نمره‌ی چشم او نمی‌شود.
🔴 قطعا "موارد خاص که همراه با بیماری زمینه‌ی چشم باشد" و یا "به‌ویژه در دوران کودکی" از این موضوع مستثنی می‌باشد.
The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from ca
